Home
AI in HealthcareCell and Gene TherapyNew Genomic Techniques for CropsCultivated MeatMethodology
US Snapshot Report
  • Main Report
    • AI in Healthcare
    • Cell and Gene Therapy
    • New Genomic Techniques for Crops
    • Cultivated Meat
    • Methodology
    • US Snapshot Report
ContactImprintPrivacy StatementConditions of Use
sign up for our newsletter
Breakthrough heroBreakthrough heroBreakthrough hero
json

How society feels about breakthrough science


DOWNLOAD FULL REPORT

One of the largest global surveys of society’s attitudes toward breakthrough technologies


Scientific advances will only succeed if people are willing to embrace them. Leaps by Bayer (the company’s impact investment arm) and BCG, together with Ipsos (a leading market research agency), recently conducted one of the largest surveys to date on global public sentiment towards four transformative technologies of our time: artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, cell and gene therapies (CGTs), new genomic techniques in agriculture (NGTs), and cultivated meat. This study aims to build a comprehensive view of public understanding, fears, hopes, and priorities surrounding these innovations. The survey was conducted online and drew responses from across 13 countries spanning between high income (Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the USA, and Singapore), upper-middle income (Brazil, China, Mexico, and South Africa) and lower-middle income countries (India and Nigeria).

The technologies were chosen based on their significant potential to impact their respective industries, their relevance, and projected timeline for market entry. While these technologies will affect everyone in some way, people in different countries could have limited understanding of them – potentially limiting their adoption and impact.

  • The Approach

    • 15 min online interviews

    • N = +1,000 per country

    • Conducted Jun-Sep 2024 by

      Ipsos icon
    • The goal is to deliver actionable insight that can facilitate societal alignment.

EXPLORE METHODOLOGY

Key findings: Belief that science and technology can solve societal challenges varies around the world


In a world grappling with economic instability and political uncertainty, breakthrough technologies inspire positivity. Our data shows a strong belief worldwide that science and technology hold the key to unlocking solutions that can significantly improve our world.

Optimism in science and technology is highest compared to the economy, and politics & global affairs

Optimism in science and technology is highest compared to the economy, and politics & global affairs

Q: At this moment, to what extent are you optimistic or pessismistic about the direction in which the world is heading in terms of science & technology (n=13,111)

The highest levels of optimism for the outlook for science and technologies is found in middle-income countries

The highest levels of optimism for the outlook for science and technologies is found in middle-income countries

Optimism is especially high in lower-middle and upper-middle-income nations such as Nigeria (94%) and China (86%). In contrast, respondents in high- income countries such as France and Japan are less optimistic (53% and 46%, respectively), and more than 30% of people in both countries are neither optimistic nor pessimistic on the direction of science and technology.

Optimism is especially high in lower-middle and upper-middle-income nations such as Nigeria (94%) and China (86%). In contrast, respondents in high- income countries such as France and Japan are less optimistic (53% and 46%, respectively), and more than 30% of people in both countries are neither optimistic nor pessimistic on the direction of science and technology.

Q: At this moment, to what extent are you optimistic or pessimistic about the direction in which the world is heading in terms of science & technology (n=13,111) Note: Optimistic includes very and fairly optimistic

To what extent are you optimistic about the potential of scientifc breakthroughs to...

To what extent are you optimistic about the potential of scientifc breakthroughs to...

Q: To what extent are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential for scientific breakthroughs to achieve each of the following … (n=13,111) Note: Optimistic including very and fairly optimistic, pessimistic including very and fairly pessimistic

Knowledgeability correlates with optimism about breakthrough science

Knowledgeability correlates with optimism about breakthrough science

Our survey studied both knowledge levels and attitudes, and across cell & gene therapy, new genomic techniques for crops and cultivated meat, we found that people who are more aware of the topics tend to be more optimistic/positive about them. Respondents reported the lowest levels of knowledge with cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops, which could be a factor in their less-positive perceptions of these innovations. 

Our survey studied both knowledge levels and attitudes, and across cell & gene therapy, new genomic techniques for crops and cultivated meat, we found that people who are more aware of the topics tend to be more optimistic/positive about them. Respondents reported the lowest levels of knowledge with cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops, which could be a factor in their less-positive perceptions of these innovations. 

Q – CGT: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential of CGT to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease and other degenerative diseases? (n=12,320) Q – NGTs: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n= 11,951) Q – CM: Overall, is your opinion of cultivated meat positive, negative, or neutral? (n=12,485) Note: Knowledgeability tested for each of these breakthrough topics with 4 true or false questions, knowledgeable = all 4 questions correct, somewhat knowledgeable = at least 2 correct of 3, not knowledgeable 3 or more incorrect, Only positive / optimistic view on breakthrough topic displayed

Trust in health authorities correlates with increased optimism in scientific breakthroughs

Trust in health authorities correlates with increased optimism in scientific breakthroughs

Cross-reference of Q1 x Q2 (n= 13,111) Q1: I trust health authorities to act in the public’s best interest Note: Trust in health authorities includes strongly agree and tend to agree, no trust in health authorities includes strongly disagree and tend to disagree Q2: To what extent are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential for scientific breakthroughs to achieve each of the following? Note: Optimistic includes very and fairly optimistic

Optimism in science and technology is highest compared to the economy, and politics & global affairs

Optimism in science and technology is highest compared to the economy, and politics & global affairs

Q: At this moment, to what extent are you optimistic or pessismistic about the direction in which the world is heading in terms of science & technology (n=13,111)

The highest levels of optimism for the outlook for science and technologies is found in middle-income countries

The highest levels of optimism for the outlook for science and technologies is found in middle-income countries

Optimism is especially high in lower-middle and upper-middle-income nations such as Nigeria (94%) and China (86%). In contrast, respondents in high- income countries such as France and Japan are less optimistic (53% and 46%, respectively), and more than 30% of people in both countries are neither optimistic nor pessimistic on the direction of science and technology.

Optimism is especially high in lower-middle and upper-middle-income nations such as Nigeria (94%) and China (86%). In contrast, respondents in high- income countries such as France and Japan are less optimistic (53% and 46%, respectively), and more than 30% of people in both countries are neither optimistic nor pessimistic on the direction of science and technology.

Q: At this moment, to what extent are you optimistic or pessimistic about the direction in which the world is heading in terms of science & technology (n=13,111) Note: Optimistic includes very and fairly optimistic

To what extent are you optimistic about the potential of scientifc breakthroughs to...

To what extent are you optimistic about the potential of scientifc breakthroughs to...

Q: To what extent are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential for scientific breakthroughs to achieve each of the following … (n=13,111) Note: Optimistic including very and fairly optimistic, pessimistic including very and fairly pessimistic

Knowledgeability correlates with optimism about breakthrough science

Knowledgeability correlates with optimism about breakthrough science

Our survey studied both knowledge levels and attitudes, and across cell & gene therapy, new genomic techniques for crops and cultivated meat, we found that people who are more aware of the topics tend to be more optimistic/positive about them. Respondents reported the lowest levels of knowledge with cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops, which could be a factor in their less-positive perceptions of these innovations. 

Our survey studied both knowledge levels and attitudes, and across cell & gene therapy, new genomic techniques for crops and cultivated meat, we found that people who are more aware of the topics tend to be more optimistic/positive about them. Respondents reported the lowest levels of knowledge with cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops, which could be a factor in their less-positive perceptions of these innovations. 

Q – CGT: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential of CGT to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease and other degenerative diseases? (n=12,320) Q – NGTs: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n= 11,951) Q – CM: Overall, is your opinion of cultivated meat positive, negative, or neutral? (n=12,485) Note: Knowledgeability tested for each of these breakthrough topics with 4 true or false questions, knowledgeable = all 4 questions correct, somewhat knowledgeable = at least 2 correct of 3, not knowledgeable 3 or more incorrect, Only positive / optimistic view on breakthrough topic displayed

Trust in health authorities correlates with increased optimism in scientific breakthroughs

Trust in health authorities correlates with increased optimism in scientific breakthroughs

Cross-reference of Q1 x Q2 (n= 13,111) Q1: I trust health authorities to act in the public’s best interest Note: Trust in health authorities includes strongly agree and tend to agree, no trust in health authorities includes strongly disagree and tend to disagree Q2: To what extent are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential for scientific breakthroughs to achieve each of the following? Note: Optimistic includes very and fairly optimistic

Juergen Eckhardt in Forbes


From the printing press to refrigeration to IVF, innovations have transformed public life. But such technological advances can only succeed if the public is willing to embrace them. Considering escalating threats like climate change, food insecurity and strained health systems, the need for innovation is greater than ever. But disinformation can fuel fear and resistance to potential breakthroughs.

Read The Article
image

A closer look at four breakthrough innovations


To better understand people’s perceptions, we asked those who feel they understand the definition what they thought about four breakthrough innovations: AI in healthcare, cell and gene therapy, new genomic techniques for crops, and cultivated meat.

Optimism / positivity towards breakthrough topics

Optimism / positivity towards breakthrough topics

Overall, the optimism in regards to science and technology was confirmed in our findings in relation to all four breakthrough innovations, with some variations. Views on healthcare innovations like AI in healthcare and cell and gene therapies are largely positive. In contrast, agricultural advancements such as cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops are met with more cautious optimism and a higher degree of neutrality.

Overall, the optimism in regards to science and technology was confirmed in our findings in relation to all four breakthrough innovations, with some variations. Views on healthcare innovations like AI in healthcare and cell and gene therapies are largely positive. In contrast, agricultural advancements such as cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops are met with more cautious optimism and a higher degree of neutrality.

Q – CGT: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential of CGT to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease and other degenerative diseases? (n= 12,320) Note: Optimistic including very and fairly optimistic, pessimistic including very and fairly pessimistic; Q – AI: To what extent do you feel positive or negative about the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the future of human health?(n=13,111) Note: Positive including very and fairly positive, negative including very and fairly negative; Q – NGTs: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n=11,951); Q – CM: Overall, is your opinion of cultivated meat positive, negative, or neutral? (n=12,485)

Generational positivity/optimism on breakthrough innovations

Generational positivity/optimism on breakthrough innovations

Across all four generations, younger people are typically more likely to support breakthrough innovations, with Gen Z and Millennials consistently more optimistic about these advancements compared to older groups.

Across all four generations, younger people are typically more likely to support breakthrough innovations, with Gen Z and Millennials consistently more optimistic about these advancements compared to older groups.

Q – CGT: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential of CGT to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease and other degenerative diseases? (n=12,320) Note: Only optimistic answers, optimistic including very and fairly optimistic; Q – AI: To what extent do you feel positive or negative about the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the future of human health? (n=13,111) Note: Only positive answers, positive including very and fairly positive, negative including very and fairly negative; Q – NGTs: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n= 11,951) Note: Only positive answers: Q – CM: Overall, is your opinion of cultivated meat positive, negative, or neutral? (n=12,485) Note: only positive

Optimism / positivity towards breakthrough topics

Optimism / positivity towards breakthrough topics

Overall, the optimism in regards to science and technology was confirmed in our findings in relation to all four breakthrough innovations, with some variations. Views on healthcare innovations like AI in healthcare and cell and gene therapies are largely positive. In contrast, agricultural advancements such as cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops are met with more cautious optimism and a higher degree of neutrality.

Overall, the optimism in regards to science and technology was confirmed in our findings in relation to all four breakthrough innovations, with some variations. Views on healthcare innovations like AI in healthcare and cell and gene therapies are largely positive. In contrast, agricultural advancements such as cultivated meat and new genomic techniques for crops are met with more cautious optimism and a higher degree of neutrality.

Q – CGT: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential of CGT to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease and other degenerative diseases? (n= 12,320) Note: Optimistic including very and fairly optimistic, pessimistic including very and fairly pessimistic; Q – AI: To what extent do you feel positive or negative about the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the future of human health?(n=13,111) Note: Positive including very and fairly positive, negative including very and fairly negative; Q – NGTs: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n=11,951); Q – CM: Overall, is your opinion of cultivated meat positive, negative, or neutral? (n=12,485)

Generational positivity/optimism on breakthrough innovations

Generational positivity/optimism on breakthrough innovations

Across all four generations, younger people are typically more likely to support breakthrough innovations, with Gen Z and Millennials consistently more optimistic about these advancements compared to older groups.

Across all four generations, younger people are typically more likely to support breakthrough innovations, with Gen Z and Millennials consistently more optimistic about these advancements compared to older groups.

Q – CGT: Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the potential of CGT to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease and other degenerative diseases? (n=12,320) Note: Only optimistic answers, optimistic including very and fairly optimistic; Q – AI: To what extent do you feel positive or negative about the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the future of human health? (n=13,111) Note: Only positive answers, positive including very and fairly positive, negative including very and fairly negative; Q – NGTs: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n= 11,951) Note: Only positive answers: Q – CM: Overall, is your opinion of cultivated meat positive, negative, or neutral? (n=12,485) Note: only positive

AI in healthcare


Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely seen as a transformative force in healthcare, with 64% of people feeling positive about its future impact on human health, 23% neutral, and 10% negative.

Artificial intellgence in health and medicine

Artificial intellgence in health and medicine

The technology is already used for drug discovery, especially in the U.S., which hosts more than half of the world’s AI companies for drug discovery businesses.

The technology is already used for drug discovery, especially in the U.S., which hosts more than half of the world’s AI companies for drug discovery businesses.

Q: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about Artificial Intelligence (AI)? I believe AI can lead to new discoveries in medicine. (n=13,111)

Majority agrees on the potential of AI

Majority agrees on the potential of AI

Q: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about Artificial Intelligence (AI)? I Believe AI could improve diagnosis. I believe AI will increase access to scarce resources such as mental health support. Base n=13,111

Openness for their doctors to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment

Openness for their doctors to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment

With 66% of all respondents definitely or probably happy for their doctor to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment, this acceptance varies significantly by region. While the major revenue is generated from AI tools in US ($11.8bn) it is surprising that only 49% would trust AI to handle their medical data, Nevertheless, AI is advancing rapidly in the US, with over 950 AI/ML-enabled medical devices cleared by the FDA, primarily in radiology, driving innovations in early diagnostics and personalized medicine.

With 66% of all respondents definitely or probably happy for their doctor to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment, this acceptance varies significantly by region. While the major revenue is generated from AI tools in US ($11.8bn) it is surprising that only 49% would trust AI to handle their medical data, Nevertheless, AI is advancing rapidly in the US, with over 950 AI/ML-enabled medical devices cleared by the FDA, primarily in radiology, driving innovations in early diagnostics and personalized medicine.

Q: Would you be happy for your doctor to use AI to support them to make decisions about your medical treatment?(n= 13,111) Note: Yes including yes-definitely and yes-probably, No including no-definitely not and no-probably not

Artificial intellgence in health and medicine

Artificial intellgence in health and medicine

The technology is already used for drug discovery, especially in the U.S., which hosts more than half of the world’s AI companies for drug discovery businesses.

The technology is already used for drug discovery, especially in the U.S., which hosts more than half of the world’s AI companies for drug discovery businesses.

Q: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about Artificial Intelligence (AI)? I believe AI can lead to new discoveries in medicine. (n=13,111)

Majority agrees on the potential of AI

Majority agrees on the potential of AI

Q: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about Artificial Intelligence (AI)? I Believe AI could improve diagnosis. I believe AI will increase access to scarce resources such as mental health support. Base n=13,111

Openness for their doctors to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment

Openness for their doctors to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment

With 66% of all respondents definitely or probably happy for their doctor to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment, this acceptance varies significantly by region. While the major revenue is generated from AI tools in US ($11.8bn) it is surprising that only 49% would trust AI to handle their medical data, Nevertheless, AI is advancing rapidly in the US, with over 950 AI/ML-enabled medical devices cleared by the FDA, primarily in radiology, driving innovations in early diagnostics and personalized medicine.

With 66% of all respondents definitely or probably happy for their doctor to use AI to support them to make decisions about their medical treatment, this acceptance varies significantly by region. While the major revenue is generated from AI tools in US ($11.8bn) it is surprising that only 49% would trust AI to handle their medical data, Nevertheless, AI is advancing rapidly in the US, with over 950 AI/ML-enabled medical devices cleared by the FDA, primarily in radiology, driving innovations in early diagnostics and personalized medicine.

Q: Would you be happy for your doctor to use AI to support them to make decisions about your medical treatment?(n= 13,111) Note: Yes including yes-definitely and yes-probably, No including no-definitely not and no-probably not

Widespread optimism for cell therapies and gene therapies


Respondents are even more positive about cell and gene therapy (CGT), with 74% optimistic about its potential to cure diseases, 21% neutral, and a mere 3% pessimistic. That strong positive sentiment across generations and regions makes CGT the highest-rated breakthrough of the four in our analysis.*

People are largely supportive of new genomic techniques (NGTs) in agriculture


Sentiment toward new genomic techniques (NGTs) in agriculture is generally positive, though less so than for the two healthcare-related innovations. In our sample, 56% hold a positive opinion, 31% are neutral, and only 8% hold negative views. To some degree, perceptions about NGTs align with the degree of regulation in a respondent’s country. For example, Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, and the U.S. have adopted more permissive frameworks for the use of NGTs in agriculture, and perceptions among respondents in those countries are more likely to be positive.

Respondents who are concerned about climate change have a more positive view on NGTs for agriculture

Respondents who are concerned about climate change have a more positive view on NGTs for agriculture

Among respondents who are concerned about climate change, 60% perceive NGTs positively, compared to only 39% of those who are not concerned. Overall, 82% of respondents express concern about climate change.

Among respondents who are concerned about climate change, 60% perceive NGTs positively, compared to only 39% of those who are not concerned. Overall, 82% of respondents express concern about climate change.

Q: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n=11,951) Note: Concerned including very and fairly concerned, not concerned including not very and not at all concerned

Regional perspectives shape views on new genomic techniques for agriculture

Regional perspectives shape views on new genomic techniques for agriculture

Q. Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? Note: Positive = only positive answers, Negative = only negative answers. Base: High Income Nation n=6,149, Lower Middle Income Nation n=1923. High Income Nation = US, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Singapore, Australia. Lower Middle Income Nation = India, Nigeria.

Highest ranked benefit of NGTs

Highest ranked benefit of NGTs

When asked which benefits would make them feel more positively toward NGTs, 75% of respondents selected ‘making crops more resilient to climate change, addressing world hunger’

When asked which benefits would make them feel more positively toward NGTs, 75% of respondents selected ‘making crops more resilient to climate change, addressing world hunger’

Q. How likely or not is each of these benefits to make you feel positively towards new genomic techniques (NGTs)? Crops  more resilient to climate change, addressingworld hunger. (n=11,951)

Respondents who are concerned about climate change have a more positive view on NGTs for agriculture

Respondents who are concerned about climate change have a more positive view on NGTs for agriculture

Among respondents who are concerned about climate change, 60% perceive NGTs positively, compared to only 39% of those who are not concerned. Overall, 82% of respondents express concern about climate change.

Among respondents who are concerned about climate change, 60% perceive NGTs positively, compared to only 39% of those who are not concerned. Overall, 82% of respondents express concern about climate change.

Q: Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? (n=11,951) Note: Concerned including very and fairly concerned, not concerned including not very and not at all concerned

Regional perspectives shape views on new genomic techniques for agriculture

Regional perspectives shape views on new genomic techniques for agriculture

Q. Overall, is your opinion of new genomic techniques (NGTs such as genome editing tools like CRISPR) positive, negative or neutral? Note: Positive = only positive answers, Negative = only negative answers. Base: High Income Nation n=6,149, Lower Middle Income Nation n=1923. High Income Nation = US, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Singapore, Australia. Lower Middle Income Nation = India, Nigeria.

Highest ranked benefit of NGTs

Highest ranked benefit of NGTs

When asked which benefits would make them feel more positively toward NGTs, 75% of respondents selected ‘making crops more resilient to climate change, addressing world hunger’

When asked which benefits would make them feel more positively toward NGTs, 75% of respondents selected ‘making crops more resilient to climate change, addressing world hunger’

Q. How likely or not is each of these benefits to make you feel positively towards new genomic techniques (NGTs)? Crops  more resilient to climate change, addressingworld hunger. (n=11,951)

The public has mixed feelings about cultivated meat


Cultivated meat—likely the most controversial of the four breakthrough innovations in our analysis—shows mixed perceptions, with 39% of respondents expressing a positive view (lowest of the four in our study), 40% remaining neutral, and 19% negative (higher than any other). Regionally, the strongest negative opinions towards cultivated meat are in selected European countries such as France (33%) and Germany (28%) and the U.S. (28%), where concerns over the potential disruption to agricultural industries and skepticism around the safety and authenticity of cultivated meat are factoring into regulatory discussions.

Likelihood to try cultivated meat

Likelihood to try cultivated meat

Countries with high GDPs and high levels of meat consumption appear to be the most reticent to try cultivated meat compared to countries where cost and availability of meat may be limiting factors.

Countries with high GDPs and high levels of meat consumption appear to be the most reticent to try cultivated meat compared to countries where cost and availability of meat may be limiting factors.

Q: How likely or unlikely are you to try cultivated meat if it were to become available near you? Please assume that cost, taste and nutritional value would be the same as conventional meat (n=13,111) Note: Likely to try includes very and fairly likely to try, unlikely to try includes very and fairly unlikely to try.

Across all dietary preferences almost one in two respondents would be likely to try cultivated meat

Across all dietary preferences almost one in two respondents would be likely to try cultivated meat

Q: How likely or unlikely are you to try cultivated meat if it were to become available near you? Please assume that cost, taste and nutritional value would be the same as conventional meat (n=13,111) Note: Likely to try includes very and fairly likely to try, unlikely to try includes very and fairly unlikely to try, omnivores includes 'other' and 'none of these' (11806), pescetarian (269), vegetarian (679), vegan (164)

Likelihood to try cultivated meat

Likelihood to try cultivated meat

Countries with high GDPs and high levels of meat consumption appear to be the most reticent to try cultivated meat compared to countries where cost and availability of meat may be limiting factors.

Countries with high GDPs and high levels of meat consumption appear to be the most reticent to try cultivated meat compared to countries where cost and availability of meat may be limiting factors.

Q: How likely or unlikely are you to try cultivated meat if it were to become available near you? Please assume that cost, taste and nutritional value would be the same as conventional meat (n=13,111) Note: Likely to try includes very and fairly likely to try, unlikely to try includes very and fairly unlikely to try.

Across all dietary preferences almost one in two respondents would be likely to try cultivated meat

Across all dietary preferences almost one in two respondents would be likely to try cultivated meat

Q: How likely or unlikely are you to try cultivated meat if it were to become available near you? Please assume that cost, taste and nutritional value would be the same as conventional meat (n=13,111) Note: Likely to try includes very and fairly likely to try, unlikely to try includes very and fairly unlikely to try, omnivores includes 'other' and 'none of these' (11806), pescetarian (269), vegetarian (679), vegan (164)

How society feels about breakthrough science

DOWNLOAD FULL REPORT

Methodology


In 2024, a comprehensive survey was conducted by Ipsos on behalf of Leaps by Bayer and BCG to capture information on attitudes toward scientific innovations and emerging technologies across 13 countries.

A 15-minute online survey was conducted by Ipsos between 27th August 2024 and 18th October 2024, amongst adults aged 18+ from 13 countries including:

  • High income: the United States, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, Singapore
  • Upper-middle income: Brazil, Mexico, China, South Africa, Australia
  • Lower-middle income: India, Nigeria

The total sample was 13,111 (1,000 in each US, Germany, Italy, France, and Australia; 1,001 in each Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, India; 1,002 in each South Africa and Japan; 1,003 in Singapore; and 1,100 in China). Participants were recruited from market research panels, and quotas were imposed to ensure national representation based on region, age and gender and employment status (as well as ethnicity in the US). The total number of interviews across the 13 countries was weighted to “country averages” (giving each country the same weight in the total), and weighting has been employed to balance demographics and ensure that the sample’s composition reflects that of the adult population according to the most recent census data on region, age, gender, employment, and ethnicity in the USA. No weighting was applied to adjust on any other demographic. Due to the online manner of the survey, the survey results should be viewed as reflecting the views of the more “connected” segment of the population.

The survey explored topics such as artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine and health, cell and gene therapy (CGT), cultivated meat (CM), new genomic techniques (NGTs), and overall attitudes toward scientific innovation. Key areas of focus included:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medicine: Awareness of AI applications in healthcare, opinions on its potential benefits, concerns regarding its use, and likelihood of utilizing AI tools or accepting AI-assisted medical support from doctors.

Cell and gene therapy (CGT): Levels of optimism or pessimism regarding CGT as a potential cure for diseases, perceived level and tested knowledge, concerns around the motives of pharmaceutical companies, and accessibility of CGT treatments.

Cultivated meat: Opinions, perceived level and tested knowledge, likelihood of trying cultivated meat, reasons for potential adoption, perceived benefits, and general awareness.

New genomic techniques (NGTs): Opinions on NGTs, perceived level and tested knowledge, perceived benefits, and understanding of the science behind it. In addition, the survey evaluated broader attitudes toward food and nutrition, knowledge of CM, NGTs, and CGT, as well as the general mindset toward scientific advancements. The survey also addressed overarching societal views, including:

  • Perceptions of the direction in which the world is heading
  • Self-defined attitudes or mindsets toward science and progress
  • Climate change and its impacts
  • Opinions on the potential for scientific breakthroughs
  • The perceived pace of innovation
  • Information overload on food, health, and food choices
  • Trust in government policies, healthcare authorities, and pharmaceutical companies

Topic definitions

Cultivated meat is genuine animal meat that is produced by growing animal cells directly. This production method eliminates the need to raise and farm animals for food. Cultivated meat is made of the same cell types that can be arranged in a similar structure as animal tissues, thus replicating the taste, texture, and nutrition of conventional meat. Cell therapies transfer living cells to a patient to prevent or treat diseases caused by damaged or malfunctioning cells. Gene therapy uses genetic material to address genetic diseases including Sickle Cell Disease, as well as some acquired diseases, like heart failure. There are thousands of cell and gene therapies in clinical trials globally. If successful, many of these therapies aim to deliver permanent or curative treatments.

New genomic techniques (NGTs) are innovative tools that can introduce small genetic changes to crops, similar to those that occur naturally or through conventional breeding, unlike GMOs. Scientists use NGTs including CRISPR and RNAi to develop crops with improved resilience to climate change, increased freshness to reduce food waste, enhanced nutrition, and other benefits.

No definition was provided for AI in Health and Medicine, given the widespread familiarity with the term AI. Additionally, in this context, a technical understanding of AI was less relevant than the use case. Instead, participants were asked about their awareness of the following health and medicine use cases for AI:

  • AI used in drug discovery
  • Remote patient monitoring tools that track risk factors and prioritize patient care
  • Medical imaging analysis that could detect problems more accurately
  • Applications that diagnose diseases based on symptoms
  • Specialized, clinically tested chatbots that offer 24/7 health advice

Authors & Contributors


Leaps Logo
Bayer logo

Matthias Berninger – Bayer, EVP, Public Affairs, Science, & Sustainability

Dr. Jürgen Eckhardt – Leaps and Bayer, EVP and Head of Leaps by Bayer and Head of BD&L for Pharmaceuticals

André Guillaume – Leaps, VP, Head of Brand & Community Engagement

Karyn Riegel – Leaps, Deputy Director of Brand & Community Engagement

Kira Peikoff – Leaps, Deputy Director of Communications

Nicki Saee - Leaps, Digital & Event Marketing Manager

Nicolas Schleyer - Market Research Director

BCG logo

Dr. Torsten Kurth - BCG, Berlin, Managing Director and Senior Partner

Dr. Friedrich Möckel - BCG Alumnus

Pascal Peters - BCG, New York, Principal

Sofia Torres Venegas - BCG, Vienna, Consultant

Judith Wallenstein - BCG, Munich, Managing Director and Senior Partner

Dr. Friedemann Wolf - BCG, Hamburg, Managing Director and Partner

Ipsos icon

Chloe Amor - Ipsos, London, Senior Research Executive

Hattie Palmer - Ipsos, London, Senior Research Executive

Serena Urzi - Ipsos, London, Project Lead, Associate Director